<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Future Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futuresense.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futuresense.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Things that shape how things will be - technology, business, life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by Shweta</title>
		<link>http://futuresense.wordpress.com/about/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Shweta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to read something written by you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to read something written by you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SaaS Platforms by Sinclair Schuller</title>
		<link>http://futuresense.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/saas-platforms/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Schuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresense.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/saas-platforms/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi! Nice post. I&#039;m one of the founders of Apprenda, and I wanted to drop a quick comment. Your observations of getting rid of the necessity to deal with various SaaS facets is correct, I do want to highlight that SaaSGrid is very different from OpSource&#039;s offering. SaaSGrid is an application container instead of a collection of services. Meaning your concern that &quot;Most of the problems in SaaS world lie in creating an application which is order of magnitudes more scalable than any premised solution&quot; is addressed. When you write an application targeting SaaSGrid, you then deploy it to SaaSGrid, which in essence has created a new breed of application server. OpSource does not provide this sort of functionality, but instead functions as a SaaS tuned managed host. SaaSGrid provides an operational and execution layer that physically contains and supports your deployed application.

As for ecosystems, you&#039;re absolutely right! As an ecosystem builds up, the value to members grows by leaps and bounds. I discussed this in a post I had on saasblogs.com, so I&#039;m definitely glad others share that perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Nice post. I&#8217;m one of the founders of Apprenda, and I wanted to drop a quick comment. Your observations of getting rid of the necessity to deal with various SaaS facets is correct, I do want to highlight that SaaSGrid is very different from OpSource&#8217;s offering. SaaSGrid is an application container instead of a collection of services. Meaning your concern that &#8220;Most of the problems in SaaS world lie in creating an application which is order of magnitudes more scalable than any premised solution&#8221; is addressed. When you write an application targeting SaaSGrid, you then deploy it to SaaSGrid, which in essence has created a new breed of application server. OpSource does not provide this sort of functionality, but instead functions as a SaaS tuned managed host. SaaSGrid provides an operational and execution layer that physically contains and supports your deployed application.</p>
<p>As for ecosystems, you&#8217;re absolutely right! As an ecosystem builds up, the value to members grows by leaps and bounds. I discussed this in a post I had on saasblogs.com, so I&#8217;m definitely glad others share that perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
